e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 0-21044
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
33-0204817
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
6101 Gateway Drive
Cypress, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
90630
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (714) 820-1000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: 13,386,305 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the
registrant were outstanding on August 5, 2005.
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share-related data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
38,531 |
|
|
$ |
42,472 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
32,673 |
|
|
|
38,433 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
22,174 |
|
|
|
23,862 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
4,076 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
101,345 |
|
|
|
111,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net |
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
10,508 |
|
|
|
10,655 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
6,295 |
|
|
|
6,550 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,877 |
|
|
|
5,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
127,514 |
|
|
$ |
140,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
17,486 |
|
|
$ |
17,559 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
4,768 |
|
|
|
4,267 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
2,721 |
|
|
|
5,914 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
6,071 |
|
|
|
8,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
31,046 |
|
|
|
36,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
31,682 |
|
|
|
36,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares
authorized; 16,789,510 and 16,642,743 shares
issued at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
respectively |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
80,752 |
|
|
|
78,872 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(3,969 |
) |
|
|
3,571 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
48,694 |
|
|
|
45,293 |
|
Deferred stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,645 |
|
|
|
127,734 |
|
Less cost of common stock in treasury, 3,430,876
and 3,084,591 shares at June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
|
(29,813 |
) |
|
|
(23,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
95,832 |
|
|
|
103,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
127,514 |
|
|
$ |
140,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
44,322 |
|
|
$ |
34,011 |
|
|
$ |
85,824 |
|
|
$ |
66,623 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
28,604 |
|
|
|
21,132 |
|
|
|
54,389 |
|
|
|
41,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
15,718 |
|
|
|
12,879 |
|
|
|
31,435 |
|
|
|
25,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
13,174 |
|
|
|
9,384 |
|
|
|
25,606 |
|
|
|
18,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
14,744 |
|
|
|
10,462 |
|
|
|
28,776 |
|
|
|
21,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
2,659 |
|
|
|
4,498 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
5,260 |
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(860 |
) |
|
|
(872 |
) |
|
|
(1,859 |
) |
|
|
(1,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
$ |
3,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
13,467 |
|
|
|
13,483 |
|
|
|
13,493 |
|
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
13,983 |
|
|
|
13,889 |
|
|
|
14,032 |
|
|
|
13,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
$ |
3,466 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
Provision for inventory write-downs |
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for employee benefit plan |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee and director stock-based compensation |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
|
5,598 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(5,848 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(3,788 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
Accrued income and other taxes |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
(839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
8,196 |
|
|
|
5,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
|
(1,703 |
) |
|
|
(924 |
) |
Acquisition of intangible assets |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
(620 |
) |
Payment for business acquired |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(2,216 |
) |
|
|
(1,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
Treasury stock purchase |
|
|
(6,110 |
) |
|
|
(5,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(4,800 |
) |
|
|
(5,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(5,121 |
) |
|
|
(639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,941 |
) |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
42,472 |
|
|
|
58,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
38,531 |
|
|
$ |
57,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries after elimination of all material intercompany accounts and transactions. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes contained in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The
financial information presented in the accompanying statements reflect all adjustments that are, in
the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented.
All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. As used herein, the terms we, us and
our refer to Universal Electronics Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates to the
contrary.
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the
amount of revenue and expense during the period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates
and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for sales returns and
doubtful accounts, warranties, inventory valuation, review for impairment of long-lived assets,
identifiable intangible assets, goodwill, contingencies, and income taxes. Actual results may
differ from those estimated and the estimates may be adjusted as more information becomes
available. Any adjustment could be significant.
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based employee compensation by applying the intrinsic-value method in
accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees. Under the intrinsic-value method, compensation cost is the excess, if
any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date over the amount an employee must pay
to acquire the stock. We grant stock options with an exercise price equal to the market value of
the common stock on the date of grant, and therefore no compensation expense has been recognized
related to options.
We have adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition
and Disclosure. Under SFAS 123, compensation expense is recognized based on the fair value of the
stock options granted and recognized over the period during which an employee is required to
provide service in exchange for the award (usually the vesting period). The fair value of the
options granted is determined at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model.
If we had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of the awards at the grant
date, net income would have been the pro forma amounts shown below.
6
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004* |
|
2005 |
|
2004* |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
$ |
3,466 |
|
Less: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under
the fair value based method for all
awards, net of related tax effects |
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(630 |
) |
|
|
(1,252 |
) |
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
948 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
2,149 |
|
|
$ |
2,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Stock compensation and the resulting pro forma net income and earnings per share for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2004 have been revised to reflect the effect of stock
option forfeitures. |
There were 115,500 options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2005. The Black-Scholes
option valuation model was used to estimate the grant date fair value of the options during the
three months ended June 30, 2005 utilizing the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of
approximately 3.96%, expected volatility of 47.66%, expected life of five years, and the common
stock will not pay dividends. The per-share weighted average grant date fair value of the options
granted during the three months ended June 30, 2005 is $7.70.
There were 610,500 options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2005. The Black-Scholes
option valuation model was used to estimate the grant date fair value of the options during the six
months ended June 30, 2005 utilizing the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of
approximately 3.71%, expected volatility of 58.78%, expected life of five years, and the common
stock will not pay dividends. The per-share weighted average grant date fair value of the options
granted during the six months ended June 30, 2005 is $9.32.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash accounts and all investments purchased with initial
maturities of three months or less. We maintain cash and cash equivalents with various financial
institutions. These financial institutions are located in many different geographic regions. We
mitigate our exposure to credit risk by placing our cash and cash equivalents with high quality
financial institutions.
Accounts Receivable and Revenue Concentrations
Trade receivables subject us to a concentration of credit risk. This risk is mitigated by a number
of factors. These factors include the size, strength, and number of customers comprising our
customer base, and our performance of ongoing credit evaluations.
We had sales to one significant customer of $7.0 million and $4.0 million representing 15.8% and
11.7% of our net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Trade
receivable with this customer amounted to $2.5 million or 7.6% and $2.4 million or 5.9% of our
total accounts receivable at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. In addition, for
the same periods, we had sales to a customer and its sub-contractors that, when combined, totaled
$8.0 million and $1.9 million accounting for 18.1% and 5.6% of net sales for the three months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Trade receivable with this customer and its subcontractors
amounted to $4.8 million or 14.6% and $2.4 million or 5.7% of our total trade receivables at June
30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
We had sales to the same significant customer of $11.8 million and $7.8 million representing 13.7%
and 11.7% of our net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In
addition, for the same periods, we had sales to a customer and its subcontractors that, when
combined, totaled $16.9 million and $4.0 million
accounting for 19.7% and 6.0% of net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
7
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Significant Suppliers
Most of the components used in our products are available from multiple sources. However, we have
elected to purchase integrated circuits, used principally in our wireless control products, and
certain other components, from three main sources. These three sources each provide in excess of
ten percent (10%) of the microprocessors used in our products. Purchases from these three major
suppliers amounted to $9.5 million, $2.4 million and $2.3 million representing 41.0%, 10.3% and
10.0%, respectively, of total inventory purchases in the quarter ended June 30, 2005.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, purchases from these three major suppliers amounted to $6.5
million, $3.1 million and $1.9 million representing 22.6%, 10.8% and 6.8%, respectively, of total
inventory purchases.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, purchases from these three suppliers amounted to $18.4
million, $4.9 million and $4.4 million representing 39.9%, 10.7%, and 9.4%, respectively, of total
inventory purchases. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, purchases from these three
suppliers amounted to $10.3 million, $2.6 million and $5.2 million representing 22.2%, 5.5%, and
11.3%, respectively, of total inventory purchases.
Accounts payable with the aforementioned three suppliers amounted to $6.4 million, $1.1 million and
$1.5 million, respectively, representing 36.7%, 6.1% and 8.7% of the total accounts payable at June
30, 2005. At December 31, 2004 accounts payable for these three suppliers amounted to $5.9 million,
$0.6 million and $1.4 million, representing 33.8%, 3.5% and 8.0% of the total accounts payable at
December 31, 2004. There was one additional significant supplier with accounts payable of $2.0
million or 11.6% of the total accounts payable at December 31, 2004.
Inventories
Inventories consisting of wireless control devices, audio/video accessories, and the related
component parts, are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in,
first-out method. New product innovations and technological advances may shorten a given products
life cycle. We continually monitor our inventory status to control inventory levels and to ensure
that we dispose of any excess or obsolete inventories on hand. We write down our inventory for
estimated obsolescence equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated
market value based upon our best estimates about future demand and market conditions. If the actual
market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory
write-downs may be required.
Net inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
Components |
|
$ |
5,957 |
|
|
$ |
8,222 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
16,217 |
|
|
|
15,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, net |
|
$ |
22,174 |
|
|
$ |
23,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended June 30, 2005 inventory write-downs totaled $0.8 million compared to $1.5
million recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2004. During the six months ended June 30, 2005
inventory write-downs totaled $1.7 million compared to $2.2 million recorded in the six months
ended June 30, 2004. Inventory write-downs are a normal part of our business, and result primarily
from product life cycle estimation variances.
Income Taxes
We use the estimated effective tax rate for the year to determine our provision for income taxes.
We recorded income tax expense of $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to
$0.9 million for the same period last year. Our estimated effective tax rate was 35.8% and 34.1%
during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. We recorded income tax expense
of $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $1.8 million for the same period
last year. Our estimated effective tax rate was 35.3% and 34.0% during the six months ended June
30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
8
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by
the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares which
includes the dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock grants. Dilutive potential
common shares for all periods presented are computed utilizing the treasury stock method. In the
computation of diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004,
1,027,500 and 1,031,000 stock options, respectively, with exercise prices greater than the average
market price of the underlying common stock were excluded because their inclusion would have been
antidilutive. In the computation of diluted earnings per common share for the six months ended June
30, 2005 and 2004, approximately 1,027,000 and 1,031,000 stock options, respectively, with exercise
prices greater than the average market price of the underlying common stock were excluded because
their inclusion would have been antidilutive.
Earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are calculated as
follows (in thousands, except per-share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
BASIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
$ |
3,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
13,467 |
|
|
|
13,483 |
|
|
|
13,493 |
|
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
$ |
3,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common
shares outstanding for
basic |
|
|
13,467 |
|
|
|
13,483 |
|
|
|
13,493 |
|
|
|
13,600 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock
options and restricted
stock |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common
shares outstanding on a
diluted basis |
|
|
13,983 |
|
|
|
13,889 |
|
|
|
14,032 |
|
|
|
13,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
The components of comprehensive (loss) income are listed below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net Income |
|
$ |
1,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
$ |
3,466 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translations |
|
|
(4,650 |
) |
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
(7,540 |
) |
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income:. |
|
$ |
(3,105 |
) |
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
$ |
(4,139 |
) |
|
$ |
2,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense), Net
The components of other income (expense), net are the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Gain on foreign currency exchange |
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
490 |
|
Other |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
2,249 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
We purchased 356,285 shares of our common stock at a cost of $6.1 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2005. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we purchased 435,290 shares of our
common stock at a cost of $5.7 million. We hold shares purchased from the open market as treasury
stock and they are available to be reissued.
New Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004, (FSP 109-1), provides guidance under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, with respect to the provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs
Act) that provides a tax deduction on qualified production activities. The Jobs Act includes a tax
deduction of up to 9 percent (when fully phased-in) of the lesser of (a) qualified production
activities income, as defined in the Jobs Act, or (b) taxable income (after the deduction for the
9
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
utilization of any net operating loss carryforwards). This tax deduction is limited to 50 percent
of W-2 wages paid by the taxpayer. FSP 109-1 states that an enterprise should account for the
deduction as a special deduction in accordance with Statement 109. In addition, FSP 109-1 requires
that the special deduction be considered by an enterprise in (a) measuring deferred taxes when
graduated tax rates are a significant factor and (b) assessing whether a valuation allowance is
necessary as required by paragraph 232 of Statement 109. We are currently evaluating the effect
that the adoption of FSP 109-1 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial
condition but do not expect it will have a material impact.
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings
Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (FSP 109-2), provides
guidance under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, with respect to recording the potential
impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on
income tax expense and deferred tax liabilities. The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004. FSP
109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment
to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign
earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. The undistributed earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. Consequently, we do not expect this
standard to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial
condition.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS 150 establishes new standards for how an
issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments that have the characteristics of both
liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified
after May 31, 2003 and otherwise was effective at the beginning of the first interim period
beginning after June 15, 2003, except for certain mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interests.
The adoption of SFAS 150 did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs An Amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory
Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, this new standard requires
that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and re-handling costs
be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of so
abnormal as stated in ARB No. 43. Additionally, SFAS 151 requires that the allocation of fixed
production overhead to the cost of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and we are
required to adopt this standard in the first quarter of 2006, beginning on January 1, 2006. We do
not expect this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and
financial condition.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets An Amendment of
APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions (SFAS 153). SFAS 153 eliminates the
exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in
paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, and replaces it
with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 specifies that a
nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected
to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is effective for the fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2005 and we are required to adopt the standard in the first quarter of
2006, beginning on January 1, 2006. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of
SFAS 153 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition but do not
expect it will have a material impact.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (SFAS
154) which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinions No. 20 Accounting Changes and SFAS No.
3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial StatementsAn Amendment of APB Opinion No.
28. SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error
corrections. It establishes retrospective application, or the latest practicable date, as the
required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction of
an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005 and we are required to adopt the standard in the
first quarter of fiscal 2006. We do not expect this standard to have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
10
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R, Share Based Payments. SFAS 123R requires companies
to expense the value of stock options and similar awards. This statement is a revision of SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123R requires a public entity
to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments
based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be
recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for
the award the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is
recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. SFAS
123R will significantly change existing accounting practice and will have a material effect on our
reported earnings. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123, no longer will be
an alternative to financial statement recognition. We are required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first
quarter of fiscal 2006, beginning January 1, 2006. Under SFAS 123R, we must determine the
appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method
for compensation cost and the transition method to be used at the date of adoption. The transition
methods include prospective and retroactive adoption options. Under the retroactive options, prior
periods may be restated either as of the beginning of the year of adoption or for all periods
presented. The prospective method requires that compensation expense be recorded for all unvested
stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption of SFAS 123R,
while the retroactive methods would record compensation expense for all unvested stock options and
restricted stock beginning with the first period restated. We are evaluating the requirements of
SFAS 123R and we expect that the adoption of SFAS 123R will have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. We have not yet determined the method of
adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS 123R, and we have not determined whether the adoption will
result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123.
In March
2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB
107) regarding the SECs interpretation of SFAS 123R and
the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. We are
evaluating the requirements of SFAS 123R and SAB 107 and expect that
the adoption of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 will have a material
impact on our consolidated results of operations and earnings per share.
We have not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of
adopting SFAS 123R, and we have not determined whether the adoption will
result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosure under SFAS 123.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We are composed of two operating segments. Under the requirements of SFAS 142, the unit of
accounting for goodwill is at a level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. SFAS 142
defines a reporting unit as either (1) an operating segment as defined in SFAS 131, Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information or (2) one level below an operating
segment referred to as a component. Our domestic and international components are reporting
units within the operating segment Core Business. SimpleDevices is the other operating segment
and is a reporting unit as well.
Goodwill for the domestic operations was generated from the acquisition of a remote control company
in 1998. Goodwill for international operations resulted from the acquisition of remote control
distributors in the UK in 1998, Spain in 1999 and France in 2000. We acquired SimpleDevices in
2004, and of the total purchase price, approximately $7.2 million was allocated to goodwill and
$2.8 million was allocated to amortizable intangible assets including engineering contracts,
developed and core technology, and trademarks and trade names.
Goodwill information for each reporting unit is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Core Business Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
International* |
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,348 |
|
|
|
3,509 |
|
SimpleDevices |
|
|
7,160 |
|
|
|
7,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Goodwill |
|
$ |
10,508 |
|
|
$ |
10,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The difference in international goodwill reported at June 30, 2005, as compared to the
goodwill reported at December 31, 2004, was the result of fluctuations in the foreign currency
exchange rates used to translate the balance into U.S. dollars. |
11
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Besides Goodwill, our other Intangible assets consist principally of distribution rights, patents,
trademarks,
purchased technologies and capitalized software costs. Capitalized amounts related to patents
represent external legal costs for the application and maintenance of patents. Intangible assets
are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit, ranging from
two to ten years.
Information regarding our other
intangible assets is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
Carrying amount: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution rights (10 years) |
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
405 |
|
Patents (10 years) |
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
3,945 |
|
Trademark and trade names (10 years) |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
Developed and core technology (5 years) |
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
Capitalized software (2 years) |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
Other (5-7 years) |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying amount |
|
$ |
9,372 |
|
|
$ |
9,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution rights |
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
Patents |
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
Trademark and trade names |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Developed and core technology |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Capitalized software |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Other |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated amortization |
|
$ |
3,077 |
|
|
$ |
2,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution rights |
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
$ |
351 |
|
Patents |
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
Trademark and trade names |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
Developed and core technology |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
Capitalized software |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
Other |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net carrying amount |
|
$ |
6,295 |
|
|
$ |
6,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was approximately $0.3
million and $0.7 million, respectively. Amortization expense for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2004 was approximately $0.1 and $0.3 million, respectively. Estimated amortization expense
for existing intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years ending December 31 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2005 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
689 |
|
2006 |
|
|
1,373 |
|
2007 |
|
|
1,086 |
|
2008 |
|
|
962 |
|
2009 |
|
|
862 |
|
2010 |
|
|
555 |
|
Derivatives
Our foreign currency exposures are primarily concentrated in the Euro and British Pound. We do not
enter into financial instruments for speculation or trading purposes. Depending on the
predictability of future receivables, payables and cash flows in each operating currency, we
periodically enter into foreign currency exchange contracts with terms normally lasting less than
six months to protect against the adverse effects that exchange-rate fluctuations may have on our
foreign currency-denominated receivables, payables and cash flows. These derivatives have not
qualified for hedge accounting. The gains and losses on both the derivatives and the foreign
currency-denominated balances are recorded as foreign exchange transaction gains or losses in other
income.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2005 we entered into foreign currency exchange contracts which
resulted in a net gain of approximately $35 thousand. We had three foreign currency exchange
contracts outstanding at June 30, 2005, two forward contracts with a combined notional value of
$15.0 million, and one option structure known as a participating forward with a notional value of
$25.0 million. We had no foreign currency exchange contracts or other derivatives at December 31,
2004.
12
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Participating Forward
The company entered into a USD/Euro participating forward with a 50% participation rate and a
notional value of $25.0 million in April 2005. The strike price of the participating forward is
$1.2675. The contract expires on December 30, 2005.
The gain recorded during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 was approximately $1.0 million, and the value of
this contract was approximately $1.0 million at June 30, 2005. The value of the contract is
included in prepaid expenses and other current assets.
Business Segments and Foreign Operations
Reportable Segments
We have two reportable segments, Core Business and SimpleDevices. The Core Business segment
produces a broad line of easy-to-use, pre-programmed universal wireless control products that are
marketed principally for home video and audio entertainment equipment through various channels of
distribution, including international retail, private label, OEMs, cable and satellite service
providers, and to companies in the computing industry. The SimpleDevices segment produces
connected-device technology solutions, as well as hardware reference designs, that link the home
computer and the Internet to existing consumer electronic devices in the home and car using
Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) compatible software that is marketed primarily to OEMs.
The disaggregated financial results for our reportable segments have been prepared using a
management approach, which is consistent with the basis and manner in which we make internal
operating and resource allocation decisions. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are
the same as those described under the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies section
contained in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The segment information does not include a full
allocation of corporate overhead costs between the SimpleDevices and Core Business segments.
Factors Used to Identify Reportable Segments
SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, defines an
operating segment, in part, as a component of an enterprise whose operating results are regularly
reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to
the segment and assess its performance. During the fourth quarter of 2004 we purchased
SimpleDevices, Inc. for approximately $12.8 million in cash, including direct acquisition costs,
and a potential performance-based payment of our unregistered common stock, if certain future
financial objectives are achieved. As a result of the performance based incentive and other
factors, we review SimpleDevices operating results on a regular basis. As the integration of
SimpleDevices operations continues, and the performance based incentive expires, we may or may not
determine in the future that SimpleDevices will continue to be a reportable segment in accordance
with SFAS 131. Other factors that we considered in the determination of reportable operating
segments included product differences, current management structure, distribution methods, and
economic characteristics. We concluded, as of June 30, 2005, that reporting SimpleDevices as a
reportable segment is in accordance with SFAS 131.
Segment Income (Loss) and Assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Core Business |
|
SimpleDevices (1) |
|
Total |
Net sales |
|
$ |
44,195 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
44,322 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
3,480 |
|
|
|
(1,075 |
) |
|
|
2,405 |
|
Assets |
|
$ |
123,840 |
|
|
$ |
3,674 |
|
|
$ |
127,514 |
|
13
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Segment Income (Loss) and Assets for the six months ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Core Business |
|
SimpleDevices (1) |
|
Total |
Net sales |
|
$ |
85,173 |
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
|
$ |
85,824 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
1,820 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
7,023 |
|
|
|
(1,763 |
) |
|
|
5,260 |
|
Assets |
|
$ |
123,840 |
|
|
$ |
3,674 |
|
|
$ |
127,514 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
SimpleDevices was acquired in October 2004, consequently the results of operations and assets
of SimpleDevices are not presented for the quarter and year to date ended June 30, 2004. In
addition, the results of operations and assets for the Core Business segment are not presented
for quarter and year to date ended June 30, 2004 as they correspond to the income and assets
in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. |
Our sales to external customers and long-lived tangible assets by geographic area are presented
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
25,741 |
|
|
$ |
17,749 |
|
|
$ |
49,046 |
|
|
$ |
35,454 |
|
International: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
3,893 |
|
|
|
5,177 |
|
|
|
8,061 |
|
|
|
10,967 |
|
Asia |
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
Spain |
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
4,129 |
|
|
|
4,279 |
|
Germany |
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
3,636 |
|
|
|
3,381 |
|
France |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
3,074 |
|
|
|
3,173 |
|
Switzerland |
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
2,953 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
South Africa |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
All Other |
|
|
3,487 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
7,421 |
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International |
|
|
18,581 |
|
|
|
16,262 |
|
|
|
36,778 |
|
|
|
31,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
44,322 |
|
|
$ |
34,011 |
|
|
$ |
85,824 |
|
|
$ |
66,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific identification of the customer location was the basis used for attributing revenues from
external customers to individual countries.
Our geographic Long-Lived asset information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
Long-lived Tangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
3,036 |
|
|
$ |
2,956 |
|
International |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
3,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,489 |
|
|
$ |
6,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Pro forma results (unaudited)
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of our
operations and SimpleDevices as if the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods
presented. Adjustments of $28,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and $56,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2004 have been made to the combined results of operations, reflecting
primarily amortization of purchased intangible assets, net of tax.
Pro forma results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 (1) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 (1) |
Revenue: |
|
$ |
44,322 |
|
|
$ |
34,286 |
|
|
$ |
85,824 |
|
|
$ |
67,255 |
|
Net income: |
|
$ |
1,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,320 |
|
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
$ |
2,812 |
|
Basic and diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The pro-forma net income does not reflect the write-off of $240,000 of acquired in-process
research and development of SimpleDevices. |
The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the
consolidated results of operations that would have been achieved had the acquisition actually been
completed as of the dates presented, and should not be taken as a projection of the future
consolidated results of our operations.
Guarantees and Product Warranties
The Company indemnifies its directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted under the laws
of the State of Delaware. The Company has purchased directors and officers insurance coverage to
cover claims made against the directors and officers during the applicable policy periods. The
amounts and types of coverage have varied from period to period as dictated by market conditions.
We warrant our products against defects in materials and workmanship arising during normal use and
service. We service warranty claims directly through our customer service department or contracted
third-party warranty repair facilities. Our warranty period ranges up to three years. We provide
for estimated product warranty expenses as we sell the related products. Because warranty expense
is a forecast based on the best available information, mostly historical claims experience, actual
claim costs may differ from the amounts provided. The change in the liability for product
warranties is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals for |
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Warranties |
|
(in Cash or in |
|
Balance at |
|
|
Beginning of |
|
Issued During |
|
Kind) During |
|
End of |
Description |
|
Period |
|
the Period |
|
the Period |
|
Period |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
167,614 |
|
|
$ |
21,710 |
|
|
$ |
(28,734 |
) |
|
$ |
160,590 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
95,005 |
|
|
$ |
216,609 |
|
|
$ |
(127,609 |
) |
|
$ |
184,005 |
|
During the first six months of 2004 there were several warranty issues that came about during the
normal course of business. As of June 30, 2005, all but one of the issues has been resolved and we
do not believe there is any remaining exposure relating to the other warranty issues. The one remaining issue is specifically
reserved for at June 30, 2005.
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
We are parties to lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of our business.
In 2002, one of our subsidiaries (One For All® S.A.S.) brought an action against a former
distributor of the subsidiarys products seeking a recovery of accounts receivable. The distributor
filed a counterclaim against our subsidiary seeking payment for amounts allegedly owed for
administrative and other services rendered by the distributor for our subsidiary. In January 2005,
the parties agreed to include claims between the distributor and two of our other subsidiaries,
namely, Universal Electronics BV (UEBV), One For All® Iberia SL, such that the proceeding covers
all claims and counterclaims between the various parties and further agreed that before any
judgments are to be paid, all matters of conflict between the various parties would be concluded.
These additional claims involve nonpayment for products and damages resulting from the wrongful
termination of agency agreements. On March 15, 2005, the court in one of the litigation matters
brought by the distributor against one of
the subsidiaries, rendered judgment against the subsidiary and awarded damages and costs to the
distributor in the amount of approximately $102,000. The subsidiary has not yet decided whether it
will appeal this decision, however, it will ask the court to stay the execution of the judgment as
it is part of the overall litigation matters between the various parties. The amount of this
judgment has been recorded as a liability as of June 30, 2005. With respect to the remaining matters before the
court, the court appointed expert has not yet finalized his pre-trial report to the court,
15
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
the
filing of which is expected to occur during the quarter ending
September 30, 2005. It is our intention
to seek a settlement of all of these matters, but if settlement is not possible, each of the
subsidiaries will continue to disagree with the allegations of the former distributor and will
vigorously defended itself against the counterclaims.
In 2003, an ex-employee of one of our subsidiaries brought an action against our subsidiary seeking
damages in the amount of approximately $191,000 for wrongful termination. The subsidiary disagreed
with these allegations and vigorously defended itself against this claim. In January 2005, judgment
was rendered for the ex-employee awarding him approximately $26,000 in damages. In March 2005, our
subsidiary paid this judgment. In February 2005, the ex-employee filed a notice of appeal, which
has been scheduled for hearing in late 2006. It is our intention to seek a settlement of this
matter with the ex-employee. If a settlement is not possible, our subsidiary will again vigorously
defend itself.
On January 7, 2004, James D. Lyon, Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Computrex, Inc. (Trustee)
filed an action against us alleging that we received preferential treatment in connection with
certain payments amounting to $528,000 made on our behalf by Computrex to our freight carriers. In
addition to seeking a return of the alleged preferential payments, the Trustee has asked for costs,
and pre- and post-judgment interest. We have not yet answered this complaint and will not need to
do so as this action is currently in abeyance while the Trustee appeals an adverse ruling against
it in another matter having facts similar to those in the Trustees action against us. In April
2005, an appellate court affirmed the ruling against the Trustee in this other matter. If and when
we answer, we intend to deny all of the material allegations made against us and defend this matter
vigorously. Finally, in May 2002, we filed a proof of claim in the amount of $106,000 with the
Bankruptcy Court against the bankruptcy estate of Computrex seeking a return of freight charges
paid to Computrex for which it failed to remit to our freight carriers.
There are no other material pending legal proceedings, other than litigation that is incidental to
the ordinary course of our business, to which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or of which
our respective property is the subject. We do not believe that any of the claims made against us in
any of the pending matters have merit (or that it is probable we have incurred a loss contingency) and, except for the employment matter of which we intend to
seek settlement, we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them. As of December 31, 2004,
because incurring a loss relating to the employment matter was both probable and estimable, a loss
contingency of $191,000 was recorded and still remains on the books
at June 30, 2005.
We maintain directors and officers liability insurance which insures our individual directors and
officers against certain claims such as those alleged in the above lawsuits, as well as attorneys
fees and related expenses incurred in connection with the defense of such claims.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
We have developed a broad line of easy-to-use, pre-programmed universal wireless control products
and audio-video accessories that are marketed to enhance home entertainment systems. Our channels
of distribution include international retail, U.S. retail, private label, OEMs, custom installers,
cable and satellite service providers and companies in the computing industry. We believe that our
universal remote control database is capable of controlling virtually all infrared remote (IR)
controlled TVs, VCRs, DVD players, cable converters, CD players, audio components and satellite
receivers, as well as most other infrared remote controlled devices worldwide.
Beginning in 1986 and continuing today, we have compiled an extensive library of over 177,000 IR
codes that cover nearly 216,000 individual device functions and over 2,500 individual consumer
electronic equipment brand names. Our library is regularly updated with new IR codes used in newly
introduced video and audio devices. All such IR codes are captured from the original manufacturers
remote control devices or manufacturers specifications to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the
database. We have also developed patented technologies that provide the
capability to easily upgrade the memory of our wireless control devices by adding IR codes from our
library that were not originally included.
Beginning in 2002, we began selling our Nevo® 1.0 software embedded on our chip to a third-party
supplier of personal digital assistant devices (PDAs). Nevo 2.0® was launched in July of 2004.
Building on this platform, we used some components of the Nevo 2.0® technology in a new product
named NevoSL® which began shipping during the second quarter. NevoSL® is a universal controller
that delivers complete audio, visual and Wi-Fi digital media control for the networked home.
From October 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, we acquired over 99% of the outstanding shares of
SimpleDevices, Inc. (SimpleDevices) for approximately $12.8 million in cash, including direct
acquisition costs, plus a performance-based payment of our unregistered common stock to be paid in
the future if certain financial objectives are achieved. We did not reflect the value of the
unregistered common stock as part of the purchase price as of June 30, 2005 since we did not
believe that it was probable the performance metrics will be met.
The value we received from this acquisition relates primarily to SimpleDevices unique
capabilities, as well as its complete and in-process technology. SimpleDevices has developed
connected-device technology solutions that link the home computer and the Internet to existing
consumer electronic devices in the home and car. The company provides Universal Plug and Play
(UPnP) compatible software to transform common home devices into connected devices that is,
allow them to find, control and share entertainment media across a home network. UPnP is an
architecture for pervasive peer-to-peer network connectivity of intelligent appliances, wireless
devices, and PCs of all form factors. It is designed to bring standards-based connectivity to
ad-hoc or unmanaged networks whether in the home, in a small business, public spaces, or attached
to the Internet. UPnP is a distributed, open networking architecture that leverages TCP/IP and the
Web technologies to enable proximity networking in addition to control and data transfer among
networked devices in the home, office, and public spaces.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations expressed as a percentage of net sales for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net sales |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
63.4 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
Research and
development
expenses |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Selling, general
and administrative
expenses |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Other income |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Income before
income taxes |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Provision for
income taxes |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Second Quarter 2005 versus Second Quarter 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
$ (millions) |
|
% of total |
|
$ (millions) |
|
% of total |
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
$ |
32.5 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
% |
|
$ |
21.2 |
|
|
|
62.4 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
44.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Consolidated
Net sales for the second quarter of 2005 were $44.3 million, an increase of 30% compared to $34.0
million for the second quarter of 2004. Net income for the second quarter of 2005 was $1.5 million
or $0.11 per share (basic) and $0.11 per share (diluted) compared to $1.7 million or $0.13 per
share (basic) and $0.12 per share (diluted) for the second quarter of 2004.
Net sales in our Business lines (subscription broadcasting, OEM, and computing companies) were
approximately 73% of net sales for the second quarter of 2005 compared to 62% for the second
quarter of 2004. Net sales in our Business lines for the second quarter of 2005 increased by 53% to
$32.5 million from $21.2 million for the same period last year. This increase in sales resulted
primarily from an increase in the volume of remote control sales which was partially offset by
lower prices. The increase in remote control sales volume was attributable to the continued
deployment of advanced function set-top boxes by the service operators and market share gains with
a few key subscription broadcasting customers. These advanced functions include digital video
recording (DVR), video-on-demand (VOD), and high definition (HD) television. Royalty revenue
(revenue earned through licensing of intellectual property) recognized in the second quarter of
2005 attributable to agreements signed in the fourth quarter of 2004 and the acquisition of
SimpleDevices also contributed to the increase in net sales. The acquisition of SimpleDevices added net
sales of $0.1 million and 1% to the Business category net sales growth. We expect that the
deployment of the advanced function set-top boxes by the service operators will continue into the
foreseeable future as penetration for each of the functions cited continues to increase. As a
result, we expect business category revenue to remain as the driver of total revenue growth for the
remainder of 2005.
Net sales in our Consumer lines (One For All® international retail, private label, custom
installers and direct import) were approximately 27% of net sales for the second quarter of 2005
compared to 38% for the second quarter of 2004. Net sales in our Consumer lines for the second
quarter of 2005 decreased by 8% to $11.8 million from $12.8 million during the same period last
year. The decrease in sales resulted primarily from private label sales, which decreased by 35% to
$1.4 million in the second quarter of 2005 from $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2004. This
was due to a decline in the volume of Kameleon sales. Kameleon sales declined during the second
quarter of 2005 compared to the second quarter of 2004, as a result of fewer new product
introductions. European retail sales also contributed to the decrease, down 6% to $8.8 million in
the second quarter of 2005 from $9.3 million in the second quarter of 2004. This decrease was
primarily attributable to lower volumes in the UK and Spanish markets, offset by the strengthening
of both the Euro and British Pound compared to the U.S. Dollar, which resulted in an increase in
net sales of approximately $0.3 million. Net of the positive foreign exchange impact, European
retail sales decreased $0.9 million compared to the second quarter of 2004. Partially offsetting
the decrease in sales was the introduction of the Nevo® SL product in the second quarter of 2005,
which generated net sales of $0.3 million. We expect that the Consumer lines will return to at or
above prior year levels for the remainder of 2005, driven by the continued rollout of the Nevo® SL
product.
Gross profit for the second quarter of 2005 was $15.7 million compared to $12.9 million for the
second quarter of
2004. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the second quarter of 2005 was 35.5% compared
to 37.9% for the second quarter of 2004. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales
was primarily attributable to subscription broadcast sales, which generally have a lower gross
profit rate as compared to our other sales, being a larger percentage of our total business. The
impact of this change in mix was a 4.1% reduction in the gross profit rate. Gross profit was also
negatively impacted by $1.2 million of cost resulting from a larger proportion of air shipments
caused by increased volume, which contributed to a 2.4% reduction in gross profit rate. These items
were
18
partially offset by lower inventory scrap expense, which as compared to the prior year quarter
added $0.5 million to gross profit and 1.9% to the gross profit rate; various cost reductions
across product lines, which added $0.4 million to gross profit and 1.1% to the gross profit rate; a
reduction in royalty expense of $0.2 million, which added 1.0% to the gross profit rate; and the
strengthening of both the Euro and British Pound compared to the U.S. Dollar, which resulted in an
increase in gross profit of approximately $0.3 million and added 0.4% to the gross profit rate. We
expect gross profit rates to be closer to historical levels of 37% to 39% for the remainder of 2005.
Research and development expenses increased 46% from $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2004 to
$1.6 million in the second quarter of 2005. This increase was primarily related to our continued
expansion of the Nevo® platform, and the development of audio-video accessories for sale in our
retail channel. We expect research and development expenses to remain at the current level
throughout 2005.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 40% from $9.4 million in the second quarter
of 2004 to $13.2 million in the second quarter of 2005. Approximately $1.7 million of the increase
was attributable to bad debt expense, which included a $1.6 million reserve for a receivable due
from a former European distributor, $1.0 million to the acquisition of SimpleDevices, $0.5 million
to payroll and benefits, $0.3 million to increased tax and audit fees, $0.2 million to product
development efforts (non research and development), $0.2 million to the appreciation of the Euro
relative to the U.S. Dollar, $0.2 million to delivery and freight costs caused by the increase in
sales volume, and $0.2 million to sales commissions. These items were partially offset by lower
employee bonus expense, which decreased by $0.5 million. We expect that selling, general and
administrative expenses will range from $12.0 to $13.0 million per quarter for the remainder of
2005.
In the second quarter of 2005, we recorded $0.1 million of net interest income compared to $0.2
million during the second quarter of 2004. This decrease was due to $0.1 million interest expense
relating to our 2001 federal tax return. Net interest income should return to approximately $0.2
million per quarter for the remainder of 2005.
For the second quarter of 2005, net other income was $1.3 million as compared to $7 thousand of
other expense for the second quarter of 2004. Approximately $1.3 million of other income in the
second quarter of 2005 was the result of a foreign exchange gain, compared to a foreign exchange
loss of $8 thousand for the second quarter of 2004.
We recorded income tax expense of $0.9 million for the second quarter of 2005 compared to $0.9
million for the second quarter of 2004. Our effective tax rate was 36% during the three months
ended June 30, 2005 compared to 34% during the three months ended June 30, 2004. The increase in
the effective tax rate was the result of not recording a tax benefit relating to the second quarter
reserve for a balance due from a former European distributor. The reserve was recorded in a subsidiary
where it is more likely than not that the resultant deferred tax asset will not be realized,
and, as such, we recorded a full valuation allowance on the tax benefit related to this reserve. During the quarter, we released discrete tax reserves related to research and development credits taken on our 2001 federal tax return.
As a result of the completion of the audit for this tax year, these reserves reduced our tax rate in the quarter by approximately 3%. We expect that our effective tax rate will
be approximately 37% for 2005, primarily as a result of the tax treatment of the reserve for the balance due from a former European distributor.
SimpleDevices
SimpleDevices recorded net sales of $0.1 million and a pretax loss of $1.1 million during the
second quarter of 2005. Sales consisted primarily of engineering services related to the
development of hardware utilized by SimpleDevices customers to run the SimplePlatforms software.
In addition, SimpleDevices also generated revenue by customizing its software products to
customers specific needs. Sales attributable to SimpleDevices are included in our Business
category when we discuss consolidated results.
Gross profit was -$0.1 million, or -78% of sales.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1.0 million, which consisted primarily of
engineering payroll and benefit costs.
19
We anticipate that sales generated as a result of software customization and engineering services
will begin to decline as a percentage of total sales as software licensing fees and the associated
maintenance fees begin to increase. We also anticipate that gross profit and gross profit as a
percentage of net sales will increase as this shift occurs.
Six Months ended June 30, 2005 versus Six Months ended June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
$ (million) |
|
% of total |
|
$ (million) |
|
% of total |
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
$ |
62.1 |
|
|
|
72.4 |
% |
|
$ |
39.3 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
85.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
66.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2005 were $85.8 million, an increase of 29% compared to
$66.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Net income for the six months ended June 30,
2005 was $3.4 million or $0.25 per share (basic) and $0.24 per share (diluted) compared to $3.5
million or $0.25 per share (basic) and $0.25 per share (diluted) for the six months ended June 30,
2004.
Net sales in our Business lines (subscription broadcasting, OEM, and computing companies) were
approximately 72% of net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 59% for the six
months ended June 30, 2004. Net sales in our Business lines for the six months ended June 30, 2005
increased by 58% to $62.1 million from $39.3 million for the same period last year. This increase
in sales resulted primarily from an increase in the volume of remote control sales which was
partially offset by lower prices. The increase in remote control sales volume was attributable to
the continued deployment of advanced function set-top boxes by the service operators and market
share gains with a few key subscription broadcasting customers. These advanced functions include
digital video recording (DVR), video-on-demand (VOD), and high definition (HD) television. Royalty
revenue (revenue earned through licensing of intellectual property) recognized in the six months
ended June 30, 2005 attributable to agreements signed in the fourth quarter of 2004 and the
acquisition of SimpleDevices contributed to the increase in net sales. The acquisition of
SimpleDevices added net sales of $0.7 million and 2% to the Business category net sales growth. We
expect that the deployment of the advanced function set-top boxes by the service operators will
continue into the foreseeable future as penetration for each of the functions cited continues to
increase. As a result, we expect business category revenue to remain as the driver of total revenue
growth for the remainder of 2005.
Net sales in our Consumer lines (One For All® international retail, private label, custom
installers and direct import) were approximately 28% of net sales for the six months ended June 30,
2005 compared to 41% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Net sales in our Consumer lines for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 decreased by 13% to $23.7 million from $27.3 million for the
same period last year. The decrease in sales resulted primarily from private label sales, which
decreased by 59% to $2.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $5.1 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2004. This was due to a decline in the volume of Kameleon sales. Kameleon
sales declined during the six months ended 2005, as compared to the six months ended 2004, as a
result of fewer new product introductions. European retail sales also contributed to the decrease,
down 4% to $19.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $19.8 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2004. This decrease was primarily attributable to lower volumes in the UK and
Spanish markets, offset by the strengthening of both the Euro and British Pound compared to the
U.S. Dollar, which resulted in an increase in net sales of approximately $0.8 million. Net of the
positive foreign exchange impact, European retail sales decreased $1.6 million compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2004. Partially offsetting the decrease in sales was the introduction of the
Nevo® SL product in the second quarter of 2005, which generated net sales of $0.3 million. We
expect that the Consumer lines will return to at or above prior year levels for the remainder of
2005, driven by the continued rollout of the Nevo® SL product.
Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $31.4 million compared to $25.5 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2004. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 was 36.6% compared to 38.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The
decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was primarily attributable to subscription
broadcast sales, which generally have a lower gross profit rate as compared to our other sales,
being a larger percentage of our total business. The impact of this change in mix was a
20
4.0%
reduction in the gross profit rate. Gross profit was also negatively impacted by $1.6 million of
cost resulting from a larger proportion of air shipments caused by increased volume, which
contributed to a 1.5% reduction in gross profit rate. These items were partially offset by lower
inventory scrap expense, which as compared to six months ended June 30, 2004, added $0.4 million to
gross profit and 1.2% to the gross profit rate; a reduction in royalty expense of $0.4 million,
which added 1.1% to the gross profit rate; the strengthening of both the Euro and British Pound
compared to the U.S. Dollar, which resulted in an increase in gross profit of approximately $0.7
million and added 0.5% to the gross profit rate; various cost reductions across product lines,
which added $0.4 million to gross profit and 0.5% to the gross profit rate; and subcontract labor
savings, which added $0.1 million to gross profit and 0.4% to the gross profit rate. We expect
gross profit rates to be closer to historical levels of 37-39% for the remainder of 2005.
Research and development expenses increased 44% from $2.2 million in the six months ended June 30,
2004 to $3.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily related to
our continued expansion of the Nevo® platform, and the development of audio-video accessories for
sale in our retail channel. We expect research and development expense to remain at the current
level throughout 2005.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 36% from $18.8 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2004 to $25.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. Approximately $1.9
million of the increase was attributable to bad debt expense, which included a $1.6 million reserve for a receivable
due from a former European distributor, $1.8 million to the acquisition of
SimpleDevices, $1.1 million to payroll and benefits, $1.0 million to delivery and freight costs
caused by the increase in sales volume, $0.6 million to increased tax and audit fees, $0.5 million
to the appreciation of the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar, $0.4 million to product development
efforts (non research and development), and $0.4 million to sales commissions. These items were
partially offset by lower employee bonus expense, which decreased by $1.0 million. We expect that
selling, general and administrative expenses will range between $12.0 and $13.0 million per quarter
for the remainder of 2005.
In the six months ended June 30, 2005, we recorded $0.4 million of net interest income compared to
$0.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2004. This increase was due to higher money
market rates and a higher average cash balance in Europe. Partially offsetting the increase was interest expense of $0.1 million relating to our 2001 federal tax return. Net interest income
should return to approximately $0.2 million per quarter for the remainder of 2005.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, net other income was $2.2 million as compared to $0.5
million of net other income for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Approximately $2.2 million of
net other income in the six months ended June 30, 2005 was the result of a foreign exchange gain,
compared to a foreign exchange gain of $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
We recorded income tax expense of $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to
$1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Our effective tax rate was 35% during the six
months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 34% during the six months ended June 30, 2004. The increase
in the effective tax rate was the result of not recording a tax benefit relating to the second
quarter reserve for a balance due from a former European distributor. The reserve was recorded
in a subsidiary where it is more likely than not that the resultant deferred tax asset will not be realized,
and, as such, we recorded a full valuation
allowance on the tax benefit related to this reserve. During the second quarter, we released
discrete tax reserves related to research and development credits taken on our 2001 federal tax
return. As a result of the completion of the audit for this tax year, these reserves reduced our
tax rate in the six month period ended June 30, 2005 by approximately 2%. We expect that our
effective tax rate will be approximately 37% for 2005, primarily as a result of the tax treatment
of the reserve for the balance due from a former European distributor.
SimpleDevices
SimpleDevices recorded net sales of $0.7 million and a pretax loss of $1.8 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2005. Sales consisted primarily of engineering services related to the
development of hardware utilized by SimpleDevices customers to run the SimplePlatforms software.
In addition, SimpleDevices also generated revenue
21
by customizing its software products to
customers specific needs. Sales attributable to SimpleDevices are included in our Business
category when we discuss consolidated results.
Gross profit was $0.1 million, or 11% of sales.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1.8 million, which consisted primarily of
engineering payroll and benefit costs.
We anticipate that sales generated as a result of software customization and engineering services
will begin to decline as a percentage of total sales as software licensing fees and the associated
maintenance fees begin to increase. We also anticipate that gross profit and gross profit as a
percentage of net sales will increase as this shift occurs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
(decrease) |
|
December 31, 2004 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
38,531 |
|
|
$ |
(3,941 |
) |
|
$ |
42,472 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
70,299 |
|
|
|
(4,782 |
) |
|
|
75,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Increase |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
(decrease) |
|
June 30, 2004 |
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
8,196 |
|
|
$ |
2,214 |
|
|
$ |
5,982 |
|
Cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(2,216 |
) |
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
(1,544 |
) |
Cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(4,800 |
) |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
(5,106 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
(5,121 |
) |
|
|
(4,482 |
) |
|
|
(639 |
) |
Our principal source of funds is from operations. Cash provided by operating activities for the
first six months of 2005 was $8.2 million as compared to $6.0 million in the first six months of
2004.
Cash used for investing activities for the first six months of 2005 was $2.2 million as compared to
$1.5 million for the first six months of 2004. The increase in cash used for investing activities
was primarily due to the acquisition of fixed assets. Capital expenditures in the first six months
of 2005 and 2004 were approximately $1.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively. These expenditures
related primarily to our acquisition of product tooling.
Cash used for financing activities for the first six months of 2005 was $4.8 million as compared to
$5.1 million for the first six months of 2004. Proceeds from stock option exercises were $1.3
million during the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to proceeds of $0.6 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2004. We purchased 356,285 shares of our common stock at a cost of $6.1
million during the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to 435,290 shares at a cost of $5.7
million during the six months ended June 30, 2004.
We hold these shares as treasury stock, and they are available for reissue. Presently, except for
using a small number of these treasury shares to compensate our outside board members, we have no
plans to distribute these shares, although we may change these plans if necessary to fulfill our
on-going business objectives. We have authority under the Credit Facility to acquire up to 1.5
million shares of our common stock in market purchases. Between the date of execution of the Credit
Facility and June 30, 2005, we have purchased 897,019 shares of our common stock leaving 602,981
remaining shares authorized for purchase under the credit facility. In 2005 we may continue to
purchase shares of our common stock if we believe conditions are favorable.
On September 15, 2003, we entered into a three-year $15.0 million unsecured revolving credit
agreement (the Credit Facility) with Comerica Bank (Comerica). Under the Credit Facility, the
interest payable is variable and is based on the banks cost of funds or the LIBOR rate plus a
fixed margin of 1.25%. The interest rate in effect as of June 30, 2005 using the LIBOR Rate option
plus a fixed margin of 1.25% was 4.59%. We pay a commitment fee ranging from zero to a maximum rate
of 1/4 of 1% per year on the unused portion of the credit line depending on the amount of cash
investment retained with Comerica during each quarter. Under the terms of this Credit Facility,
dividend payments are allowed for up to 100% of the prior fiscal years net income, to be paid
within 90 days of
22
year end. We are subject to certain financial covenants related to our net worth,
quick ratio, and net income. Amounts available for borrowing under this Credit Facility are reduced
by the outstanding balance of import letters of credit. As of June 30, 2005, we did not have any
amounts outstanding under this credit facility or any outstanding import letters of credit.
Furthermore, as of June 30, 2005, we were in compliance with all financial covenants required by
the Credit Facility.
It is our policy to carefully monitor the state of our business, cash requirements and capital
structure. We believe that funds generated from our operations and available from our borrowing
facility will be sufficient to fund current business operations and anticipated growth at least
over the next twelve months; however, there can be no assurance that such funds will be adequate
for that purpose.
New Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004, (FSP 109-1), provides guidance under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, with respect to the provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs
Act) that provides a tax deduction on qualified production activities. The Jobs Act includes a tax
deduction of up to 9 percent (when fully phased-in) of the lesser of (a) qualified production
activities income, as defined in the Jobs Act, or (b) taxable income (after the deduction for the
utilization of any net operating loss carryforwards). This tax deduction is limited to 50 percent
of W-2 wages paid by the taxpayer. FSP 109-1 states that an enterprise should account for the
deduction as a special deduction in accordance with Statement 109. In addition, FSP 109-1 requires
that the special deduction be considered by an enterprise in (a) measuring deferred taxes when
graduated tax rates are a significant factor and (b) assessing whether a valuation allowance is
necessary as required by paragraph 232 of Statement 109. We are currently evaluating the effect
that the adoption of FSP 109-1 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial
condition but do not expect it will have a material impact.
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings
Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (FSP 109-2), provides
guidance under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, with respect to recording the potential
impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on
income tax expense and deferred tax liabilities. The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004. FSP
109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment
to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign
earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. The undistributed earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. Consequently, we do not expect this
standard to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial
condition.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS 150 establishes new standards for how an
issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments that have the characteristics of both
liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified
after May 31, 2003 and otherwise was effective at the beginning of the first interim period
beginning after June 15, 2003, except for certain mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interests.
The adoption of SFAS 150 did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs An Amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory
Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, this new standard requires
that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage,
double freight, and re-handling costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether
they meet the criterion of so abnormal as stated in ARB No. 43. Additionally, SFAS 151 requires
that the allocation of fixed production overhead to the cost of conversion be based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June
15, 2005 and we are required to adopt this standard in the first quarter of 2006, beginning on
January 1, 2006. We do not expect this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations and financial condition.
23
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets An Amendment of
APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions (SFAS 153). SFAS 153 eliminates the
exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in
paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, and replaces it
with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 specifies that a
nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected
to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is effective for the fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2005 and we are required to adopt the standard in the first quarter of
2006, beginning on January 1, 2006. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of
SFAS 153 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition but do not
expect it will have a material impact.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (SFAS
154) which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinions No. 20 Accounting Changes and SFAS No.
3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial StatementsAn Amendment of APB Opinion No.
28. SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error
corrections. It establishes retrospective application, or the latest practicable date, as the
required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction of
an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005 and we are required to adopt the standard in the first
quarter of fiscal 2006. We do not expect this standard to have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R, Share Based Payments. SFAS 123R requires companies
to expense the value of stock options and similar awards. This statement is a revision of SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123R requires a public entity
to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments
based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be
recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for
the award the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is
recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. SFAS
123R will significantly change existing accounting practice and will have a material effect on our
reported earnings. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123, no longer will be
an alternative to financial statement recognition. We are required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first
quarter of fiscal 2006, beginning January 1, 2006. Under SFAS 123R, we must determine the
appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method
for compensation cost and the transition method to be used at the date of adoption. The transition
methods include prospective and retroactive adoption options. Under the retroactive options, prior
periods may be restated either as of the beginning of the year of adoption or for all periods
presented. The prospective method requires that compensation expense be recorded for all unvested
stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption of SFAS 123R,
while the retroactive methods would record compensation expense for all unvested stock options and
restricted stock beginning with the first period restated. We are evaluating the requirements of
SFAS 123R and we expect that the adoption of SFAS 123R will have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. We have not yet determined the method of
adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS 123R, and we have not determined whether the adoption will
result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123.
In March
2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB
107) regarding the SECs interpretation of SFAS 123R and
the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. We are
evaluating the requirements of SFAS 123R and SAB 107 and expect that
the adoption of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 will have a material
impact on our consolidated results of operations and earnings per share.
We have not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of
adopting SFAS 123R, and we have not determined whether the adoption will
result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosure under SFAS 123.
Factors That May Affect Financial Condition and Future Results
Forward Looking Statements
We caution that the following important factors, among others (including but not limited to factors
discussed below
or above in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, as well as those factors discussed in the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, or in our
other reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, could affect our
actual results and could contribute to or cause our actual consolidated results to differ
materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. The factors included here
are not exhaustive. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such
statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to
reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
24
New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible
for us to predict all such factors, nor can we assess the impact of each such factor on the
business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Therefore,
forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual future results.
While we believe that the forward looking statements made in this report are based on reasonable
assumptions, the actual outcome of such statements are subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, including the failure of our customers and markets to continue growing and expanding
in the manner we anticipated; the economic environments effect on us and our customers; the growth
of, acceptance of and the demand for our products and technologies in various markets and
geographical regions, including cable, satellite, consumer electronics, retail and interactive TV
and home automation, not materializing as we believed; our inability to add profitable
complementary products which are accepted by the marketplace; our inability to continue to maintain
our operating costs at acceptable levels through our cost containment efforts; our inability to
maintain the strength of our balance sheet; our inability to continue selling our products or
licensing our technologies at higher or profitable margins; the lack of continued growth of our
technologies and product lines addressing the market for digital media; our inability to obtain
orders or maintain our order volume with new and existing customers; the possible dilutive effect
our stock option program may have on our earnings per share and stock price; our inability to
continue to obtain adequate quantities of component parts or secure adequate factory production
capacity on a timely basis; the effect the Euro and other foreign currencies could have on our
financial results; and other factors listed from time to time in our press releases and filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Dependence upon Key Suppliers
Most of the components used in our products are available from multiple sources. However, we have
elected to purchase integrated circuits, used principally in our wireless control products, and
certain other components, from three main sources, each of which provides in excess of ten percent
(10%) of the microprocessors used in our products. We have identified alternative sources of supply
for these integrated circuit components, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to
continue to obtain these components on a timely basis. We generally maintain inventories of our
integrated chips, which could be used in part to mitigate, but not eliminate, delays resulting from
supply interruptions. An extended interruption, shortage or termination in the supply of any of the
components used in our products, or a reduction in their quality or reliability, or a significant
increase in prices of components, would have an adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and cash flows.
Dependence on Foreign Manufacturing
Third-party manufacturers located in foreign countries manufacture a majority of our wireless
controls. Our arrangements with our foreign manufacturers are subject to the risks of doing
business abroad, such as import duties, trade restrictions, work stoppages, political instability,
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, and other factors, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows. We believe that the loss of any one
or more of our manufacturers would not have a long-term material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and cash flows, because numerous other manufacturers are available to fulfill
our requirements; however, the loss of any of our major manufacturers could adversely affect our
business until alternative manufacturing arrangements are secured.
Potential Fluctuations in Quarterly Results
Historically, our business has been influenced by the retail sales cycle, with increased sales in
the last half of the year and the largest proportion of sales occurring in the last quarter.
Factors such as quarterly variations in financial results could have a material adverse affect on
the volatility and market price of our common stock.
We may from time to time increase our operating expenses to fund greater levels of research and
development, sales and marketing activities, development of new distribution channels, improvements
in our operational and financial systems, development of our customer support capabilities, and to
support our efforts to comply with various government regulations. To the extent such expenses
precede or are not subsequently followed by increased revenues, our business, operating results,
financial condition and cash flows will be adversely affected.
25
In addition, we may experience significant fluctuations in future quarterly operating results that
may be caused by many other factors, including demand for our products, introduction or enhancement
of products by us and our competitors, the loss or acquisition of any significant customers, market
acceptance of new products, price reductions by us or our competitors, mix of distribution channels
through which our products are sold, level of product returns, mix of customers and products sold,
component pricing, mix of international and domestic revenues, foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations and general economic conditions. In addition, as a strategic response to changes in
the competitive environment, we may from time to time make certain pricing or marketing decisions
or acquisitions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or
financial condition. As a result, we believe period-to-period comparisons of our results of
operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future
performance.
Due to all of the foregoing factors, it is likely that in some future quarters our operating
results will be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. If this happens the
price of our common stock will likely be materially adversely affected.
Dependence on Consumer Preference
We are susceptible to fluctuations in our business based upon consumer demand for our products. We
believe that our success depends on our ability to anticipate, gauge and respond to fluctuations in
consumer preferences. However, it is impossible to predict with complete accuracy the occurrence
and effect of fluctuations in consumer demand for our products. Moreover, we caution that any
growth in revenues that we achieve may be transitory and should not be relied upon as an indication
of future performance. Thus, we cannot guarantee that increases in our remote control sales
associated with increases in the deployment of advanced set-top boxes will continue. In addition,
while we expect our consumer lines of business to return to prior year levels for the remainder of
2005, we make no assurance that this will happen.
Demand for Consumer Service and Support
We have continually provided domestic and international consumer service and support to our
customers to add overall value and to help differentiate us from our competitors. We continually
review our service and support group and are marketing our expertise in this area to other
potential customers. To date, we have not obtained any new customers, and there can be no assurance
that we will be able to attract new customers in the future.
In addition, Our Kameleon® and Nevo® line of products have more features and are more complex than
our older products and therefore may require more end-user technical support. For our Nevo® product
line, we currently rely, and intend to continue to rely, on the distributor or dealers to provide
first line technical support to the end-users. However, we provide the second level of technical
support for bug fixes and other issues at no additional charge. Therefore, as the mix of our
products includes Nevo® and other more complex product lines, support costs could increase, which
would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Dependence Upon Timely Product Introduction
Our ability to remain competitive in the wireless control products market will depend considerably
upon our ability to successfully identify new product opportunities, as well as developing and
introducing these products and enhancements on a timely and cost effective basis. There can be no
assurance that we will be successful at developing and marketing new products or enhancing our
existing products, or that these new or enhanced products will achieve consumer acceptance and, if
achieved, will sustain that acceptance. In addition, there can be no assurance that products
developed by others will not render our products non-competitive or obsolete or that we will be
able to obtain or maintain the rights to use proprietary technologies developed by others which are
incorporated
in our products. Any failure to anticipate or respond adequately to technological developments and
customer requirements, or any significant delays in product development or introduction, could have
a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, the introduction of new products may require significant expenditures for research and
development, tooling, manufacturing processes, inventory and marketing. In order to achieve high
volume production of any new product, we may have to make substantial investments in inventory and
expand our production capabilities.
26
Dependence on Major Customers
The economic strength and weakness of our worldwide customers affect our performance. We sell our
wireless control products and proprietary technologies to private label customers, original
equipment manufacturers, and companies involved in the subscription broadcasting industry. We also
supply our products to our wholly owned, non-U.S. subsidiaries and to independent foreign
distributors, who in turn distribute our products worldwide, with Europe, Asia, South Africa,
Australia, and Argentina currently representing our principal foreign markets.
During each of the first two quarters of 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004, we had sales to
one customer that amounted to more than ten percent of our net sales for the respective period. In
addition, for the same periods, we had sales to a customer and its sub-contractors, that when
combined, exceeded 10% of net sales for the respective period. The future loss of these customers
or any key customer, either in the United States or abroad, due to their financial weakness,
bankruptcy, or our inability to maintain order volume with these customers, may have an adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
SimpleDevices Inc.
On October 1, 2004, we acquired SimpleDevices Inc. for approximately $12.8 million in cash
including direct acquisition costs, plus a performance-based payment of our unregistered common
stock to be paid in the future, if certain financial objectives are achieved. SimpleDevices, based
in San Mateo, California, develops software and firmware solutions that can enable devices such as
TVs, set-top boxes, stereos, automotive audio systems and other consumer electronic products to
wirelessly connect and interact with home networks and interactive services to deliver digital
entertainment and information. The success of SimpleDevices will depend upon (i) our ability to
bring SimpleDevices products to market in a timely and cost effective manner; (ii) the market
accepting SimpleDevices products and technology to the extent anticipated by us; (iii) our ability
to integrate SimpleDevices products and business into our own product offerings and business in a
cost effective manner; and (iv) our ability to control the overall costs associated with
SimpleDevices in the manner we anticipate. The failure of any of these items could have a material
effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Internal Investments
During 2004 we hired personnel to develop and market additional products that are part of the Nevo®
platform family. In addition, outside resources were used, and will continue to be used, to develop
these products. Furthermore, there is certain minimum inventory purchases associated with these
products. Since software based media control products are a departure from our traditional
business, there is greater financial risk associated with these products.
Competition
The wireless control industry is characterized by intense competition based primarily on product
availability, price, speed of delivery, ability to tailor specific solutions to customer needs,
quality, and depth of product lines. Our competition is fragmented across our products, and,
accordingly, we do not compete with any one company across all product lines. We compete with a
variety of entities, some of which have greater financial and other resources. Our ability to
remain competitive in this industry depends in part on our ability to successfully identify new
product opportunities, develop and introduce new products and enhancements on a timely and cost
effective basis, as well as our ability to successfully identify and enter into strategic alliances
with entities doing business within the industries we serve. There can be no assurance that our
product offerings will be, and/or remain, competitive or that any strategic alliances, if any, will
achieve the type, extent, and amount of success or business that we expect them to
achieve in that sales of Nevo products may not occur or grow in the manner expected by us, and
thus we may not recoup cost incurred in the research and development of these products as quickly
as we expect or at all.
Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights
The procedures by which we identify, document and file for patent, trademark, and copyright
protection are based solely on engineering and management judgment, with no assurance that a
specific filing will be issued,
or if issued,
27
will deliver any lasting value to us. There is no
assurance that rights granted under any patent will provide competitive advantages to us or will be
adequate to safeguard and maintain our proprietary rights. Moreover, the laws of certain countries
in which our products are or may be manufactured or sold may not offer protection on such products
and associated intellectual property to the same extent that the U.S. legal system may offer.
In our opinion, our intellectual property holdings as well as our engineering, production, and
marketing skills and the experience of our personnel are of equal importance to our market
position. We further believe that none of our businesses are materially dependent upon any single
patent, copyright, trademark, or trade secret.
Some of our products include or use technology and/or components of third parties. While it may be
necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of such products, we
believe that, based upon past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be
obtained on commercially reasonable terms; however, there is no guarantee that such licenses could
be obtained on such terms or at all. Because of technological changes in the wireless and home
control industry, current extensive patent coverage, and the rapid rate of issuance of new patents,
it is possible certain components of our products and business methods may unknowingly infringe
upon the patents of others.
Potential for Litigation
As is typical in our industry and for the nature and kind of business in which we are engaged, from
time to time various claims, charges and litigation are asserted or commenced by third parties
against us or by us against third parties, arising from or related to product liability,
infringement of patent or other intellectual property rights, breach of warranty, contractual
relations or employee relations. The amounts claimed may be substantial, but they may not bear any
reasonable relationship to the merits of the claims or the extent of any real risk of court awards
assessed against us or in our favor.
Effects on Universal Due to International Operations
The risks of doing business internationally could adversely affect our sales, operations, earnings
and cash flows due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
changes in a countrys or regions economic or political conditions, including
inflation, recession, interest rate fluctuations and actual or anticipated military
conflicts; |
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations affecting sales, particularly in the Euro and British
Pound, which contribute to variations in sales of products and services in impacted
jurisdictions and also affect our reported results expressed in U.S. dollars; |
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations affecting costs, particularly the Euro, British Pound and
the Chinese Yuan, which contribute to variances in costs in impacted jurisdictions and also
affect our reported results expressed in U.S. dollars; |
|
|
|
|
longer accounts receivable cycles and financial instability among customers; |
|
|
|
|
trade regulations and procedures and actions affecting production, pricing and marketing of products; |
|
|
|
|
local labor conditions, customs, and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the regulatory or legal environment; |
|
|
|
|
differing technology standards or customer requirements; |
|
|
|
|
import, export or other business licensing requirements or requirements
relating to making foreign direct investments, which could affect our ability to obtain
favorable terms for components or lead to penalties or restrictions; |
28
|
|
|
difficulties associated with repatriating cash generated or held abroad in a
tax-efficient manner and changes in tax laws; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in freight costs and disruptions at important geographic points of exit and entry; and |
|
|
|
|
natural and medical disasters. |
General Economic Conditions
General economic conditions, both domestic and foreign, have an impact on our business and
financial results. The global economy remains uncertain. As a result, individuals and companies may
delay or reduce expenditures. Weak global economic conditions and/or softness in the consumer and
telecommunications sector could result in lower demand for our products, resulting in lower sales,
earnings and cash flows.
Terrorism and Acts of War
Terrorism and acts of war (wherever occurring throughout the world) may cause damage or disruption
to us, our employees, facilities, partners, suppliers, distributors, resellers or customers, which
could significantly impact our revenue, costs, expenses and financial condition. We are
predominately uninsured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts and acts of war.
Leased Property
We lease all of the properties used in our business. During 2005, our lease contract for the
property located in Cypress California will expire. We
are currently negotiating a new or renewal lease, and we believe that
a new or renewed lease will be entered into before the current lease expires, and that when entered
into, the lease will be satisfactory for our needs and purposes. However, we can give no assurance
that we will enter into the new or renewal lease, or that, if entered into, the new lease terms
will be similar to the existing terms or that the terms of any such new or renewal leases will not
have a significant and material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
Technology changes in wireless control
We currently derive substantial revenue from the sale of wireless remote controls based on infrared
(IR) technology. Other control technologies exist or could be developed that could compete with IR.
If other wireless control technology gains acceptance, and starts to be integrated into home
electronics devices currently controlled through our IR remote controllers, demand for our products
may decrease, resulting in lower sales, earnings and cash flows.
Failure to Retain and Recruit Key Personnel Would Harm Our Ability to Grow and Meet Key
Objectives.
Our ability to achieve revenue growth in the future will depend, in part, on our success in
recruiting and retaining highly skilled advanced technology, managerial, sales, and marketing
personnel. Our corporate office, including our advance technology engineering group, is based in
Southern California. The high cost of living in Southern California makes it difficult to attract
talent from outside the region and may also put pressure on overall employment related expense. The
inability to retain and attract qualified personnel in a timely manner, or the loss of any key
personnel, could make it difficult to meet key objectives, such as timely and effective product
introductions.
Change in Competition and Pricing
We rely on third-party manufacturers to build our universal wireless control products, based on our
extensive IR code library and patented technology. Price is always an issue in winning and
retaining business. If customers become increasingly price sensitive, new competition could arise
from manufacturers who decide to go into direct competition with us or from current competitors who
perform their own manufacturing. If such a trend develops, we could experience downward pressure on
our pricing or lose sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations.
29
Transportation Costs; Impact of Oil Prices
We ship products from our foreign manufacturers via ocean and air transport. It is sometimes
difficult to forecast swings in demand and, as a result, products may be shipped via air which is
more costly than ocean shipments. Often, we cannot recover the increased cost of airfreight from
our customers. The inability to predict swings in demand can increase the cost of freight which
could have a material adverse effect on our product margins.
In addition, we have an exposure to oil prices in two forms. The first is in the prices of the
oil-based materials that we use in our products, which are primarily the plastics and other
components that we include in our finished remotes and audio-video accessories. The second form is
in the cost of delivery and freight, which would be passed on by the carriers that we use in the
form of higher rates. We record freight-in as a cost of sales, and freight-out in operating
expenses. Rising oil prices may have an adverse effect on cost of sales and operating expenses.
Our Proprietary Technologies May Include Design or Performance Defects and May Not Achieve
Their Intended Results
We produce highly complex products that incorporate leading-edge technology, including hardware,
firmware, and software. Firmware and software may contain bugs that can unexpectedly interfere with
operations. There can be no assurance that our testing programs will detect all defects, either in
individual products or defects that could affect numerous shipments. The presence of defects may
harm customer satisfaction, reduce sales opportunities, or increase returns. An inability to cure
or repair a product defect could result in the failure of a product line, temporary or permanent
withdrawal from a product or market, damage to our reputation, increased inventory costs, or
product reengineering expenses, any of which could have a material impact on our revenues, margins
and net income.
Acquisitions
We may, from time to time, pursue the acquisition of businesses, products or technologies that
complement or expand our existing operations, including those that could be material in size and
scope. Acquisitions involve many risks, including the diversion of managements attention away from
day-to-day operations. There is also the risk that we will not be able to successfully assimilate
the operations, personnel, customer base, products or technologies of an acquired business. Such
acquisitions could also have adverse short-term effects on our operating results, and could result
in dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, and the loss of key employees.
In addition, business acquisitions must be accounted for as purchases and, because most
technology-related acquisitions involve the purchase of significant intangible assets, these
acquisitions typically result in substantial amortization charges and charges for acquired research
and development projects, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
There can be no assurance that any such acquisitions will occur or, if such acquisitions do occur,
that the acquired businesses, customer bases, products or technologies will generate sufficient
revenue to offset the associated costs or effects.
30
Outlook
Our focus is to build technology and products that make the consumers interaction with devices and
content within the home easier and more enjoyable. The pace of change in the home is increasing.
The growth of new devices, such as DVD players, PVR/DVR technologies and home theater solutions, to
name only a few, has transformed control of the home entertainment center into a complex challenge
for the consumer. The more recent introduction and projected growth of digital media technologies
in consumers lives will further increase this complexity. We have set out to create the interface
for the connected home, building a bridge between the home devices of today and the networked home
of the future. We intend to invest in new products and technology, particularly in the connected
home space, which will expand our business beyond the control of devices to the control of and
access to content, such as digital media, to enrich the entertainment experience.
We will continue enhancing our leadership position in our core business by developing custom
products for our subscription broadcasting, OEM, retail, and computing customers, growing our
capture expertise in existing infrared technology and emerging radio frequency standards, adding to
our portfolio of patented or patent pending technologies and developing new platform products. We
also are developing new ways to enhance remote controls and other accessory products.
During 2004, we continued to develop new products featuring our Kameleon® interface technology, a
display technology that provides ease of use by illuminating only the keys needed to control each
entertainment device. We also continued development of our Nevo® technology, an embedded solution
that transforms an electronic display (such as HPs iPaq Pocket PC) into a sophisticated and
easy-to-use wireless home control and automation device. We are continuing to seek ways to
integrate these platform technologies into other forms and devices. Nevo 2.0® was launched in July
of 2004 as a feature on a series of HPs handheld devices. Building on this platform, we used some
components of the Nevo 2.0® technology in a new product named Nevo SL® which we began to ship in
the second quarter. This product is designed for use in the home. In addition, we are working on
product line extensions to our One For All® audio/video accessories which include digital antennas,
signal boosters, television brackets and A/V cleaning products.
We are also seeking ways to increase our customer base worldwide, particularly in the areas of
subscription broadcasting, OEM, and One For All® international retail. We will continue to work on
strengthening existing relationships by working with customers to understand how to make the
consumer interaction with products and services within the home easier and more enjoyable. We
intend to invest in new products and technology to meet our customer needs now and into the future.
From October 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, we acquired over 99% of the outstanding shares of
SimpleDevices Inc. for approximately $12.8 million in cash, plus a performance-based payment of our
unregistered common stock, tied to achieving certain future financial objectives. SimpleDevices,
based in San Mateo, California, develops software and firmware solutions that can enable devices
such as TVs, set-top boxes, stereos, automotive audio systems and other consumer electronic
products to wirelessly connect and interact with home networks and interactive services to deliver
digital entertainment and information. This smart device category is emerging and we look to
build upon these relationships and the softwares potential in future product and customer
announcements.
In 2005, we will continue to evaluate acceptable acquisition targets and strategic partnership
opportunities in our core business lines as well as in the networked home marketplace. We caution,
however, that no assurance can be made that any suitable acquisition target or partnership
opportunity will be identified and, if identified, that a transaction can be consummated. Moreover,
if consummated, no assurance can be made that any such acquisition or partnership will profitably
add to our operations.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to various market risks, including interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations. We have established policies, procedures and internal processes governing our
management of market risks and the use of financial instruments to manage our exposure to these
risks.
31
The interest payable under our revolving Credit Facility with our bank is variable and based on
either (i) the banks cost of funds or (ii) the LIBOR rate plus a fixed margin of 1.25%; the rate
is affected by changes in market interest rates. At June 30, 2005, we had no borrowings on our
credit line. The interest rate in effect on the credit line as of June 30, 2005 using the LIBOR
Rate option plus a fixed margin of 1.25% was 4.59%.
At June 30, 2005 we had wholly owned subsidiaries in The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany,
France, Argentina and Spain. Sales from these operations are typically denominated in local
currencies including Euros, British Pounds and Argentine Pesos, thereby creating exposure to
changes in exchange rates. Changes in local currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. Dollar,
and in some cases, to each other, may positively or negatively affect our sales, gross margins and
net income. From time to time, we enter into foreign currency exchange agreements to manage our
exposure arising from fluctuating exchange rates that affect cash flows and our reported income.
Contract terms for the foreign currency exchange agreements normally last less than six months. We
do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes. The sensitivity of earnings
and cash flows to the variability in exchange rates is assessed by applying an approximate range of
potential rate fluctuations to our assets, obligations and projected results of operations
denominated in foreign currency. Based on our overall foreign currency rate exposure at June 30,
2005, we believe that movements in foreign currency rates could have a material affect on our
financial position. We estimate that if the exchange rates for the Euro and the British Pound
relative to the U.S. Dollar fluctuate 10% from June 30, 2005, third quarter net income and cash
flows would fluctuate by approximately $1.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively.
The value of our net balance sheet positions
held in foreign currency can also be impacted by fluctuating exchange rates, as can the value of the
income generated by our European subsidiaries. It is difficult to estimate the impact of fluctuations
on reported income, as it depends on the opening and closing rates as well as the average net balance sheet
positions held in a foreign currency, and, the amount of income generated in local currency.
We routinely forecast what these balance sheet positions and income generated in local currency may be
and we take steps to minimize exposure as we deem appropriate. There are currently three contracts in place
with a combined notional value of $40 million in order to minimize risk to reported income associated with these types of
exposures.
We estimate that if the exchange rate for the Euro
relative to the U.S. Dollar fluctuates 10% from June 30, 2005,
the value of the $15 million in forward contracts would
fluctuate by approximately $1.5 million, and the value of the $25 million
participating forward would fluctuate by approximately $1.5 to $2.0 million.
As a result of the foregoing factors (discussed under this caption Quantitative And Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk and above under the caption Factors That May Affect Financial
Condition And Future Results), as well as other variables that affect our operating results, past
financial performance should not be considered a reliable indicator of future performance, and
investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d) defines disclosure controls and procedures to mean controls and
procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms. The
definition further states that disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation,
controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by a
company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management
team, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial
officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report, to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by
this report that materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In 2002, one of our subsidiaries (One For All® S.A.S.) brought an action against a former
distributor of the subsidiarys products seeking a recovery of accounts receivable. The distributor
filed a counterclaim against our subsidiary seeking payment for amounts allegedly owed for
administrative and other services rendered by the distributor for our subsidiary. In January 2005,
the parties agreed to include claims between the distributor and two of our other subsidiaries,
namely, Universal Electronics BV (UEBV), One For All® Iberia SL, such that the proceeding covers
all claims and counterclaims between the various parties and further agreed that before any
judgments are to be paid, all matters of conflict between the various parties would be concluded.
These additional claims involve nonpayment for products and damages resulting from the wrongful
termination of agency agreements. On March 15, 2005, the court in one of the litigation matters
brought by the distributor against one of the subsidiaries, rendered judgment against the
subsidiary and awarded damages and costs to the distributor in the amount of approximately
$102,000. The subsidiary has not yet decided whether it will appeal this decision, however, it will
ask the court to stay the execution of the judgment as it is part of the overall litigation matters
between the various parties. The amount of this judgment has been recorded as a liability as of June 30, 2005.
With respect to the remaining matters before the court, the court appointed expert has not yet
finalized his pre-trial report to the court, the filing of which is expected to occur during the
third quarter of 2005. It is our intention to seek a settlement of all of these matters,
but if settlement is not possible, each of the subsidiaries will continue to disagree with the
allegations of the former distributor and will vigorously defended itself against the
counterclaims.
In 2003, an ex-employee of one of our subsidiaries brought an action against our subsidiary seeking
damages in the amount of approximately $191,000 for wrongful termination. The subsidiary disagreed
with these allegations and vigorously defended itself against this claim. In January 2005, judgment
was rendered for the ex-employee awarding him approximately $26,000 in damages. In March 2005, our
subsidiary paid this judgment. In February 2005, the ex-employee filed a notice of appeal, which
has been scheduled for hearing in late 2006. It is our intention to seek a settlement of this
matter with the ex-employee. If a settlement is not possible, our subsidiary will again vigorously
defend itself.
On January 7, 2004, James D. Lyon, Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Computrex, Inc. (Trustee)
filed an action against us alleging that we received preferential treatment in connection with
certain payments amounting to $528,000 made on our behalf by Computrex to our freight carriers. In
addition to seeking a return of the alleged preferential payments, the Trustee has asked for costs,
and pre- and post-judgment interest. We have not yet answered this complaint and will not need to
do so as this action is currently in abeyance while the Trustee appeals an adverse ruling against
it in another matter having facts similar to those in the Trustees action against us. In April
2005, an appellate court affirmed the ruling against the Trustee in this other matter. If and when
we answer, we intend to deny all of the material allegations made against us and defend this matter
vigorously. Finally, in May 2002, we filed a proof of claim in the amount of $106,000 with the
Bankruptcy Court against the bankruptcy estate of Computrex seeking a return of freight charges
paid to Computrex for which it failed to remit to our freight carriers.
There are no other material pending legal proceedings, other than litigation that is incidental to
the ordinary course of our business, to which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or of which
our respective property is the subject. We do not believe that any of the claims made against us in
any of the pending matters have merit and, except for the employment matter of which we intend to
seek settlement, we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them. As of December 31, 2004,
because incurring a loss relating to the employment matter was both probable and estimable, a loss
contingency of $191,000 was recorded and still remains on the books
at June 30, 2005.
In addition to the above, there were no material developments or terminations with respect to any
previously reported legal proceeding, during the period covered by this report. Reference is made
to the description of the legal proceedings in Note 19 contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 for information regarding reportable legal proceedings pending
as of that date.
33
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
During the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, we did not sell any equity securities
that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1934. However, we purchased 356,285 shares of
our common stock at a cost of approximately $6.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005
and during the six months ended June 30, 2004, we purchased 435,290 shares of our common stock at a
cost of $5.7 million. Purchase information is set forth by month in the following table:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Maximum Number of Shares |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average |
|
Publicly Announced Plans |
|
that May Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
or |
|
Under the Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
January 1, 2005 - January 31, 2005 |
|
|
99,654 |
|
|
$ |
17.33 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
February 1, 2005 - February 28, 2005 |
|
|
6,631 |
|
|
$ |
16.80 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
March 1, 2005 - March 31, 2005 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Q1 2005 |
|
|
106,285 |
|
|
$ |
17.30 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 April 30, 2005 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
May 1, 2005 May 31, 2005 |
|
|
171,701 |
|
|
$ |
16.97 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
June 1, 2005 June 30, 2005 |
|
|
78,299 |
|
|
$ |
17.34 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Q2 2005 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
17.09 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2004 - January 31, 2004 |
|
|
55,090 |
|
|
$ |
13.23 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
February 1, 2004 - February 28, 2004 |
|
|
76,000 |
|
|
$ |
12.72 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
March 1, 2004 - March 31, 2004 |
|
|
162,200 |
|
|
$ |
12.73 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Q1 2004 |
|
|
293,290 |
|
|
$ |
12.82 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 April 30, 2004 |
|
|
69,900 |
|
|
$ |
12.82 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
May 1, 2004 May 31, 2004 |
|
|
68,600 |
|
|
$ |
14.18 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
June 1, 2004 June 30, 2004 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
$ |
14.55 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Q2 2004 |
|
|
142,000 |
|
|
$ |
13.52 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The Company held its Annual Meeting on June 15, 2005. The term of one of the Companys five
directors expired at the meeting. This director was re-elected by the stockholders for the term
indicated. The stockholders also ratified the appointment of the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm. Results of the voting were as follows:
Election of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
Term Expiring in |
|
In Favor |
|
Withheld |
Paul D. Arling |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
12,365,002 |
|
|
|
313,150 |
|
Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
In Favor |
|
Opposed |
|
Abstain |
12,188,692
|
|
471,720
|
|
17,740 |
34
Item 6. EXHIBITS
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of Paul D. Arling, Chief Executive Officer of Universal
Electronics Inc. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of Bryan Hackworth, Chief Accounting Officer (principal
financial officer) of Universal Electronics Inc. |
|
|
32 |
|
Section 1350 Certifications of Paul D. Arling, Chief Executive Officer of Universal
Electronics Inc., and Bryan Hackworth, Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial
officer) of Universal Electronics Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
Date:
August 9, 2005
|
|
Universal Electronics Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
\s\ Bryan Hackworth |
|
|
|
|
|
Bryan Hackworth |
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial
officer) |
35
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of Paul D. Arling, Chief
Executive Officer of Universal Electronics Inc. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of Bryan M. Hackworth, Chief
Accounting Officer (principal financial officer) of
Universal Electronics Inc. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of Paul D. Arling, Chief
Executive Officer of Universal Electronics Inc., and Bryan
M. Hackworth, Chief Accounting Officer (principal
financial officer) of Universal Electronics Inc. pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
36
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
I, Paul D. Arling, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Universal Electronics Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 9, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul D. Arling
|
|
|
Paul D. Arling |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
I, Bryan M. Hackworth, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Universal Electronics Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 9, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bryan M. Hackworth
|
|
|
Bryan M. Hackworth |
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial officer) |
|
exv32
Exhibit 32
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of Universal Electronics Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 9, 2005
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Paul D. Arling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Bryan M. Hackworth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(principal financial officer) |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Universal Electronics Inc. and
will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.